Comparison between Adhesives and Traditional Joining Methods

In addition to adhesives, traditional joining methods can also be used for bonding. Below, Foshan Puhui New Materials Co., Ltd. introduces the comparison between adhesives and traditional joining methods.

Compared to traditional joining methods, structural adhesives can provide higher strength, corrosion resistance, and a longer service life in most production applications. Structural adhesives can bond different materials with even stress distribution. Traditional joining methods are relatively limited in material application, primarily used for wood. In addition to wood, structural adhesives can bond steel, plastics, and other materials. They can also address the issue of stress concentration in traditional joining methods, resulting in more even stress distribution and preventing damage to parts when bonding thin materials.

Structural adhesives better preserve the integrity of parts and reduce loss compared to traditional joining methods. When using traditional welding and riveting, the surface often leaves defects, burrs, and other imperfections. However, materials and components bonded with structural adhesives can maintain their integrity, reducing losses caused by surface defects.

Structural adhesives have a broader bonding range. Traditional joining methods can no longer be applied to the bonding of modern materials such as steel, new energy sources, electronics, and electrical appliances!

Neutral weatherproof adhesives can be used in various applications. Neutral weatherproof adhesives are used in concrete construction. They do not require primers and are easier to use and operate, making them common in construction. Neutral weatherproof adhesives are used for sealing seams of various raw materials, such as seams in metal materials, glass materials, and seams between aluminum and tiles. Neutral weatherproof adhesives are also used in the processing and sealing of glass curtain walls, enhancing the weather resistance of glass.